Most Single Mothers Aren’t So By Choice

May 12, 2022 | Femininity

Recently, new findings from the Pew Research Center showed that the share of Americans who view single motherhood and cohabitation as negative for society rose significantly from 2018 to 2021. Meanwhile, various media, news, and entertainment outlets still sell “single motherhood by choice” as empowerment and disdain preferences for the traditional family structure as archaic or misogynistic. Why are Americans resisting this narrative and cementing their views that children need both mothers and fathers?

The Myth of “Single Motherhood By Choice”

Many famous women have chosen to become single mothers through adoption or medical procedures such as IVF. By and large, their decisions have been approved and promoted by the popular culture as just another “choice” for women to find self-fulfillment, available to any woman who wants to have children regardless of her marital status. But as many famous single mothers will attest, it’s no walk in the park, and they can’t do it on their own – or at least without paying a pretty penny. An Us Weekly profile of “Celebrity Single Moms Who Do It All Without a Partner” reveals in fact the opposite: raising a child alone isn’t something one does alone. Comedienne Mindy Kaling admitted she can only do it “with the help of a full-time nanny and her retired dad.” Actress Lucy Liu told CBS in 2016, “I don’t really raise [my son] by myself…I have a lot of friends and a group of people who help me.” So while single motherhood by choice has been given the spotlight, countless caretakers, nannies, grandparents, and others stand in the shadows doing the unseen work usually split between mothers and fathers in the traditional family.

The Unchosen Compromises of Single Motherhood

The past few turbulent years have revealed a country whose very foundations are unraveling. Chaos and strife fill streets, homes, and our governmental branches. Perhaps Americans watching this unfold in the public square before their very eyes see with greater clarity how the erosion of family life attacks the very foundation of societal stability. The proliferation of single motherhood across our society has had disastrous effects on boys in particular, leading to lower achievement, reduced future income, and a higher rate of criminal activity. Are we to blame single mothers themselves for this state of affairs? Of course not. Many of them are in the impossible position of both providing for and raising children at the same time, splitting time between work and home, struggling to put food on the table while also paying for suitable childcare when they’re away. Though we’re hesitant to “discriminate” between single motherhood and two-parent households, it’s obvious that mothers stretched thin with work and child-rearing are suffering. For most single mothers, it is a struggle, and not sustainable by oneself. Famous mothers have the advantages of higher income, thicker networks, and more. It’s the mothers who can’t choose who suffer because of the false impression “single motherhood by choice” generates in society.

Are We Just Being Judgmental?

On top of the erosion of the public square, one imagines that the past two years of COVID crisis have had as much of an impact, if not more, on single mothers than on two-parent families – as the burdens of work, childcare, chores, and education fell on single mothers alone. An article in the Institute for Family Studies blog asked IFS Senior Fellow Dr. Scott Stanley whether Americans “are simply becoming more judgmental about women raising children on their own.” Dr. Stanley wonders instead “if this is the voice of ever-increasing experience with these relationship and family patterns. I would suspect it’s more about people experiencing how much harder it is to be a single parent.” Children of single mothers are surely grateful for everything their mothers did for them, but also probably recognize how difficult it was for them at times. We suspect that children of single mothers, however grateful, would not want to replicate that family structure for their own children – something those privileged enough to have grown up with two parents, to afford childcare and other luxuries should take to heart.

Latest Posts

Monogamy Needs No Cure

Monogamy Needs No Cure

In recent years, ethical non-monogamy has increasingly been promoted by organizations and institutions as a legitimate alternative to monogamy. Despite the United States’ long-standing legacy of monogamy and the limited influence of individuals engaging in behaviors most would have categorized as promiscuity or infidelity, today’s proponents of ENM claim that romantic, sexual, or intimate relationships with multiple people can not only be normal, but ethical. Contrary to the foundational Judeo-Christian understanding of monogamy as natural and religiously ordained – as well as the understanding that human beings are creatures with souls, free will, and the capacity to make moral choices – the sole ethical foundation of ENM is consent. Through the lens of consent, sexual morality is reduced to a single calculation in a contractual exchange – my “enthusiastic yes” for the satisfaction of your desire, regardless of its objective moral dimension. 

Phubbing: A World of Distraction

Phubbing: A World of Distraction

In the 21st century, there are few technologies that match the smartphone. With the world at our fingertips, it seems that there are few limits on what we can learn and achieve – the sheer amount of knowledge, communication, and entertainment available online is staggering. However, as many of us have experienced, the downside of this great tool is distraction and information overload, particularly from the parts of our lives which depend upon our dedicated attention – our family and friends.There is only so much our brains can handle at once, and yet the goal of social media is our unceasing attention and engagement. Powerful algorithms curate content which makes us feel as though our desires are uncannily met, if not influenced without our prior knowledge or consent. Setting aside the powerful rewards systems vying for our attention, smartphones also absorb our time because of the digital alternatives they offer to analog utilities, such as real life books and notebooks, music libraries, calendars, and maps. Though the smartphone lightens our practical load in many ways, it increases social dysfunction in real life.

What Is Sex Realism?

What Is Sex Realism?

A new publication called Fairer Disputations, part of the Wollstonecraft Project initiative of the Abigail Adams Institute, has as its goal the articulation of a new form of feminism “grounded in the basic premise that sex is real.” Gathering a group of scholars and writers who abide by the 18th-century feminist Mary Wollstonecraft’s “understanding of rights grounded in responsibilities,” the project seeks to facilitate the study of issues affecting women’s dignity and rights in the contemporary world. Today, there are countless instances where popular feminism has adopted a corporate, overly politicized framework which fails to address the real life-concerns of women – and alienated those who do not share the belief that gender is a choice. 

Dating Doesn’t Stop Once You’re Married

Dating Doesn’t Stop Once You’re Married

Dating doesn’t stop once you’re married. In fact, according to figures from a new report by UVA’s National Marriage Project, dating well grows even more crucial as you navigate life’s mountains and valleys together. Of the 2,000 U.S. couples surveyed about their dating frequency, 52% reported “never or rarely going out on dates.” while 48% reported regular dates “at least once or twice a month.” As Alysse ElHage at the Institute for Family Studies explains, those couples who made time for regular date nights were “14 to 15 percentage points more likely to report being ‘very happy’ in their marriages compared to those who reported less regular date nights.” Far from simply taking a “night out away from the kids,” regular dating in marriage would seem to indicate greater intentionality and thus stability in the marriage itself.

Marriage Is a Crash Course in How to Love

Marriage Is a Crash Course in How to Love

In the New York Times, on February 9, 2023, journalist Michal Liebowitz draws a fascinating parallel between the mutual identification of twins and that of spouses. After briefly recollecting her youthful impatience for adult couples who used the royal “we” – we liked that show; we love that restaurant – Liebowitz explains how her husband’s relationship with his twin brother taught her to accept a certain level of boundary porosity in her marriage. Contrasting the idea of the “pure relationship” with a “past vision of romance,” Liebowitz concludes that “surrendering one’s ‘I’ for the sake of the ‘we'” is the best antidote to the sickness of modern individualism.

Communicate Love, Not Therapy-Speak

Communicate Love, Not Therapy-Speak

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported last year that 21.6% of adults received mental health treatment in 2021, up from 19.2% in 2019 – young adults between the ages of 18 and 44, particularly women, were more likely to have received treatment. Back in 2018, NBC News reported results from a survey by the Hopelab Foundation and Well Being Trust which found that “90% of teens and young adults with symptoms of depression said they had gone online for information about mental health issues, compared with 48% of those without any symptoms.” Big Tech and social media are knowingly responsible, as Brad Wilcox observed in the Institute for Family Studies blog, for the rise in young adult anxiety, depression, and suicide, “among other pathologies.”