Choosing Motherhood

Jul 1, 2021 | Femininity

America’s declining birthrate has become the hot topic of late as President Biden, senators, and policymakers put forward their plans to alleviate the economic burdens on American families. While economics are an important driver of the decline, their role is only partial as the cultural tide has increasingly turned away from marriage and family. Among young women in their twenties, the New York Times notes an enormous decrease in childbearing from 2007 to 2019, suggesting that many women are having children later in life, and even then are less likely to be having them at all. This should come as no surprise, since more women are pursuing education, travel, and careers than ever before. But women are not impervious to the tug-of-war between fertility and personal enrichment, since they alone are biologically able to bear a child. Instead of focusing exclusively on policy questions, we should attend to the reasons why women delay childbirth regardless of desire.

More Choices Than Ever

In an opinion column responding to discussions about the birthrate, Jill Filipovic writes that women are delaying motherhood because they have more choices and this is a good thing. Looking past the “negative framings” of conservative and liberal onlookers who respectively identify a loss of traditional family values and economic policy as root causes of the fallen birthrate, she asks,

“what if lower birthrates are a good thing? For a great many individual women, reconsidering motherhood doesn’t reflect hardship or unmet desire, but rather a new landscape of opportunity. As a country, we would be better off if we saw significant demographic changes as data points that can give us important clues about what people want, what they need and how we might improve their lives.”

While her narrow interest in women’s issues fails to account for the possibly disastrous consequences of sub-replacement levels of fertility, Filipovic is right to note that these demographic changes should help us better understand where women are today. But while women’s reasons for delaying motherhood are as various as they are, “having more choices” does not begin to describe the complexity of the way women feel about having children. For example, most women probably want an education; however, the reasons for pursuing this education vary widely – pursuing knowledge, establishing oneself economically, and breaking generational cycles of poverty and dysfunction are very different motivations for the similar outcome of obtaining a degree. Many women are putting off childbirth not because they do not desire children, but because they are waiting for the right partner and to be personally ready for the responsibility themselves.

Delaying, Or Patiently Waiting?

All these different motivations, while producing a similar mass outcome, point toward a crucial truth of femininity and motherhood, which is that there is immense value in waiting. There is the kind of waiting that consists of putting-off, delaying, or procrastinating, while there is another kind which looks more like patient anticipation of the proper time. Think of the young woman waiting for the right man to come along who is going to love her, treat her well, and be there for his family. If indirectly, she is already invested in her future family and the children within it. Think of the woman working to provide for her aging parents, or the woman seeking to devote herself to a meaningful career. Women desire to be with and nurture others, but are waiting for an opportune time. While fear too can prevent a woman from diving headlong into the search for a husband or the journey toward motherhood, patience in these matters is a laudable virtue – and an especially maternal one at that. Women who choose to wait on motherhood are often exercising proper judgment in choosing what’s good through patient deliberation. This is something liberals should consider as they are shaping policy, and an impulse conservatives should respect. If we want to encourage motherhood, we should take women’s desires (as well as their desire to wait) seriously, while encouraging them through policy initiatives and a better culture.

Latest Posts

Monogamy Needs No Cure

Monogamy Needs No Cure

In recent years, ethical non-monogamy has increasingly been promoted by organizations and institutions as a legitimate alternative to monogamy. Despite the United States’ long-standing legacy of monogamy and the limited influence of individuals engaging in behaviors most would have categorized as promiscuity or infidelity, today’s proponents of ENM claim that romantic, sexual, or intimate relationships with multiple people can not only be normal, but ethical. Contrary to the foundational Judeo-Christian understanding of monogamy as natural and religiously ordained – as well as the understanding that human beings are creatures with souls, free will, and the capacity to make moral choices – the sole ethical foundation of ENM is consent. Through the lens of consent, sexual morality is reduced to a single calculation in a contractual exchange – my “enthusiastic yes” for the satisfaction of your desire, regardless of its objective moral dimension. 

Phubbing: A World of Distraction

Phubbing: A World of Distraction

In the 21st century, there are few technologies that match the smartphone. With the world at our fingertips, it seems that there are few limits on what we can learn and achieve – the sheer amount of knowledge, communication, and entertainment available online is staggering. However, as many of us have experienced, the downside of this great tool is distraction and information overload, particularly from the parts of our lives which depend upon our dedicated attention – our family and friends.There is only so much our brains can handle at once, and yet the goal of social media is our unceasing attention and engagement. Powerful algorithms curate content which makes us feel as though our desires are uncannily met, if not influenced without our prior knowledge or consent. Setting aside the powerful rewards systems vying for our attention, smartphones also absorb our time because of the digital alternatives they offer to analog utilities, such as real life books and notebooks, music libraries, calendars, and maps. Though the smartphone lightens our practical load in many ways, it increases social dysfunction in real life.

What Is Sex Realism?

What Is Sex Realism?

A new publication called Fairer Disputations, part of the Wollstonecraft Project initiative of the Abigail Adams Institute, has as its goal the articulation of a new form of feminism “grounded in the basic premise that sex is real.” Gathering a group of scholars and writers who abide by the 18th-century feminist Mary Wollstonecraft’s “understanding of rights grounded in responsibilities,” the project seeks to facilitate the study of issues affecting women’s dignity and rights in the contemporary world. Today, there are countless instances where popular feminism has adopted a corporate, overly politicized framework which fails to address the real life-concerns of women – and alienated those who do not share the belief that gender is a choice. 

Dating Doesn’t Stop Once You’re Married

Dating Doesn’t Stop Once You’re Married

Dating doesn’t stop once you’re married. In fact, according to figures from a new report by UVA’s National Marriage Project, dating well grows even more crucial as you navigate life’s mountains and valleys together. Of the 2,000 U.S. couples surveyed about their dating frequency, 52% reported “never or rarely going out on dates.” while 48% reported regular dates “at least once or twice a month.” As Alysse ElHage at the Institute for Family Studies explains, those couples who made time for regular date nights were “14 to 15 percentage points more likely to report being ‘very happy’ in their marriages compared to those who reported less regular date nights.” Far from simply taking a “night out away from the kids,” regular dating in marriage would seem to indicate greater intentionality and thus stability in the marriage itself.

Marriage Is a Crash Course in How to Love

Marriage Is a Crash Course in How to Love

In the New York Times, on February 9, 2023, journalist Michal Liebowitz draws a fascinating parallel between the mutual identification of twins and that of spouses. After briefly recollecting her youthful impatience for adult couples who used the royal “we” – we liked that show; we love that restaurant – Liebowitz explains how her husband’s relationship with his twin brother taught her to accept a certain level of boundary porosity in her marriage. Contrasting the idea of the “pure relationship” with a “past vision of romance,” Liebowitz concludes that “surrendering one’s ‘I’ for the sake of the ‘we'” is the best antidote to the sickness of modern individualism.

Communicate Love, Not Therapy-Speak

Communicate Love, Not Therapy-Speak

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported last year that 21.6% of adults received mental health treatment in 2021, up from 19.2% in 2019 – young adults between the ages of 18 and 44, particularly women, were more likely to have received treatment. Back in 2018, NBC News reported results from a survey by the Hopelab Foundation and Well Being Trust which found that “90% of teens and young adults with symptoms of depression said they had gone online for information about mental health issues, compared with 48% of those without any symptoms.” Big Tech and social media are knowingly responsible, as Brad Wilcox observed in the Institute for Family Studies blog, for the rise in young adult anxiety, depression, and suicide, “among other pathologies.”